Keeping Out Of Trouble With Websites
By Bruce Methven
It is easier to get in trouble with a website than you might
think. What follows, then, are a few tips to help keep your
website clear of problems. A word of caution: the law is changing
in this area, and the specific facts of each case make a huge
difference.
1. DOMAIN NAMES
a. Before you register a domain name, be sure to check for
existing trademark registrations. If you dont, and there
is a pre-existing trademark, your domain name may be taken
away from you.
i. Check the California business-name list.
ii. Conduct a search of the federal trademark register.
iii. Perform an Canadian search.
iv. Also do a Dialog or similar search for state and business-name
registries.
b. Even if you obtain a domain name, you may lose that name
if you do not use it for a real website. (A pure under
construction page will not suffice, so get some sort
of content and contact information on the site.)
2. LINKING AND FRAMING
a. Several website owners have been sued because their sites
either a) linked to other Web pages without appropriately
identifying the target page or b) framed other sites so that
it seemed like someone else's Web page was part of the framing
website.
b. Basically, the problem is one of misidentification: the
offending website links or frames in such a way that the viewer
doesn't realize who really owns the target site. Similar to
plagiarism, it's taking credit either expressly or by implication
for Web pages other than your own.
i. For example, linking without attribution was the basis
of the Ticketmaster Corp. v. Microsoft Corp. case. There,
Ticketmaster sued Microsoft for using links that took users
directly to the ticket-sales pages of Ticketmaster's site,
circumventing advertising and Ticketmaster's home page.
ii. Framing was the issues in Washington Post v. TotalNEWS,
Inc. There the complaint alleged that "Specifically,
Defendants' website is designed to feature the content of
Plaintiffs' and others' websites, inserted within a "frame"
on the computer screen that includes Defendants' totalnews.com
logo and URL as well as advertising that Defendants have sold."
Obviously, the defendants were trying to make Washington Post
content look like their own.
c. So what should you do?
i. Well, the most conservative course is to either:
(1) get permission for every link or
(2) link only to other folks' pages where those pages themselves
clearly identify the owner and contain any advertising that
the owner uses.
ii. This approach is not practical in most situations, of
course. Where it's not, at least do the following:
(1) When you insert links in your Web page, make sure they
identify (correctly) the owner and name of the target page.
(2) If you use framing to pull up other folks' Web pages
within your own, make sure you don't imply in any way that
the site within the frame is yours.
(3) If a site has a linking policy posted, be sure to follow
it.
3. TRADEMARKS AND TRADE NAMES
a. Another set of problems arises from using someone else's
trademarks or trade names as part of your website, either
in the main text or in "metatags".
b. Metatags are key words and phrases used to help search
engines categorize a website; they are normally hidden from
the user's view, although they are in fact part of the website.
When a user performs a Web search using one or more key words
or phrases, some search engines prepare a list of sites based
on matches with the metatags embedded in those sites. Some
search engines also analyze the readable text of websites
in their matching functions.
c. Here the problems have arisen where a website uses others'
trademarks or trade names or a competitor's trademarks or
trade names to draw traffic to its site. (This is not limited
to officially registered trademarks: Even if a name isn't
registered, the owner may have rights in the name simply from
using it.)
d. Having said this, there are some exceptions:
i. For example, comparative advertising which names a competitor
in a non-confusing and truthful comparison does not constitute
infringement.
ii. In addition, you can use another's trademark or trade
name to identify the source of the goods or services of which
you are complaining or discussing. In one famous case, a disgruntled
former Bally Fitness customer was permitted to keep www.ballysucks.com
because he was using it to criticize Bally.
iii. There is also an exception if the words used are truthfully
descriptive. For example, there was no liability for a former
Playboy "Playmate of the Year" who built a website
that used the plaintiff's "Playmate of the Year",
"Playmate of the Month" and "Playboy"
trademarks, both on the site itself and as metatags. (Playboy
Enterprises, Inc. v. Terri Welles.)
e. Recommended approach:
i. Even if you are going to use another's trademarks or trade
names in a permitted way, to avoid trouble be sure to minimize
their use, make it clear that those owners are not endorsing
your site, and be sure to use disclaimers.
(1) (Disclaimer here means a statement along the following
lines: "'Coca Cola' and the other trademarks and trade
names mentioned in this site are the property of their respective
owners. We have no affiliation with these companies and this
website is not endorsed by them.")
ii. Also, if the owner of the trademark uses the "R"
within a circle or the superscript "TM" symbols
with the name, be sure to include that whenever you use the
trademark.
4. COPYRIGHTS
a. Just because someone else's Web page does NOT contain
a copyright notice does NOT mean that the material is in the
public domain. The only way you can be certain you are safe
is by either getting express permission from the owner to
use the material or finding a statement on that site that
allows you to use the material. (Many sites allow you to use
their material for non-commercial purposes only.)
b. There is a fair use exception to the copyright
law that allows you to use PART of anothers persons
work (not the entire work) without consent for purposes of
review, comment, etc., particularly if the use is non-commercial.
Basically, the more of the work that is taken and the more
commercial the use to which it is put, the less likely that
this exception applies. Because this can be complicated, talk
to an attorney before trying to use the fair use
exception.
5. DEFAMATION AND PRIVACY
a. Remember that just being on the Internet does not protect
you against claims of libel. If you put something defamatory
on your website or type it in a chat room or post it on a
bulletin board you can be sued just the same as if you were
handling out leaflets.
b. There are, of course, two classic defenses here: truth
and opinion. If you state things that are clearly true or
you clearly identify a statement as only your opinion or belief,
generally you can speak freely.
c. However, even then, you may run into trouble if you disclose
private facts about someone else or you cast them in a false
light, even if not in a defamatory fashion (for example, deliberately
stating that a life-long Democrat is a neo-conservative Republican).
d. Because the entire area relating to defamation is complex,
it might be wise to run any statements you are unsure of past
an attorney before posting them.
e. If you host a bulletin board or chat room on your website,
you run the risk of potential liability if others post obscenity,
libelous remarks, material taken without permission, links
to sites that allow illegal free downloads of commercial software,
etc.
i. You should make each user of a bulletin or chat room use
a click through user agreement where they consent
not to post pornographic, defamatory or infringing materials
or links to sites conducting illegal activities. They should
also consent to your company not being liable for other users
taking such actions.
ii. If you are a service provider or are hosting a bulletin
board or chat room, you can help protect yourself against
liability for copyright violations by others using your site
by registering under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act.
(See http://www.copyright.gov/onlinesp/.)
6. OWNERSHIP
a. If your webmaster/mistress is your employee when your
site is created or updated, you own the work. That is NOT
true with independent contractors: the contractor owns the
work unless there is a written agreement to the contrary.
(Without a written agreement, you have only a non-exclusive
license to use the work.)
a. Your agreements with independent contractors should not
only state that you own the work, they should also include
an assignment of ownership rights in the resulting product
to your company. Work for hire clauses alone may
not be sufficient.
i. In California many companies forego the work made
for hire language because California Labor Code Section
3351.5(c) and California Unemployment Insurance Code Sections
621(d) and 686 treat anyone working under such a clause as
an employee for unemployment and disability insurance purposes.
ii. You may want to give yourself a power of attorney to
sign copyright documents on behalf of the contractor as well.
iii. Its fine to let a web contractor retain the rights
to any underlying software or scripts that operate your site,
so long as you have an irrevocable, royalty-free license to
use them.
7. CHILDREN'S ONLINE PRIVACY PROTECTION ACT
The Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA)
requires websites to obtain a parent's permission before children
under 13 disclose information. (Children under 18 should not
be permitted to view information which is adult in nature.)
Also note that children under 18 may not be bound by any agreements
that you have. You ARE entitled to rely on a users statement
that he/she is over 18 unless you have some reason to believe
they are not telling the truth.
8. PROTECTING YOURSELF
a. Although a copyright notice is not required on a website,
it is good practice, since it puts others on notice that you
are NOT putting that content in the public domain. (This helps
overcome any alleged innocent infringer defense.)
A copyright notice should be in the following form:
Copyright 2000-2003 Bruce E. Methven. All Rights Reserved.
You can also use the © symbol in place of Copyright,
but do not use just (c). The first year that the work was
created must be included. (Designating a first year later
than the real one can invalidate copyright rights.) Subsequent
years where substantial changes were made can be added either
as a range (2000-2003) or singly (2000, 2002).
b. Jurisdiction is a big issue. If you are selling goods/services
over the Internet, you should have your agreement state that
lawsuits may only be brought in California. Otherwise, the
customer can sue you wherever the customer is located.
c. If you are engaged in e-commerce, you should have a click-through
agreement on your website that your customers must use. It
is not enough to simply have your agreement on the site; if
the customer is not required to click through
it, it may not be binding.
d. Implied warranties can arise from statements, advertisements
etc.
i. With goodsincluding softwarethe law creates
warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular
purpose.
(1) Implied warranties must be expressly disclaimed: State
that there are no other warranties except as expressly set
out in the agreement, including any warranties of merchantability
or fitness for a particular purpose.
(2) DISCLAIMER LANGUAGE MUST BE CONSPICUOUS, E.G., IN CAPITAL
LETTERS O R BOLD TYPE. Otherwise consumers (and others) may
not be bound by it.
ii. It doesnt hurt to use these disclaimers even if
you are providing services rather than goods.
e. Whether you are providing goods or services over the Internet,
you want your agreement to contain limitations of liability
and remedies.
i. Expressly limit the remedy to replacement and/or repair
(or correction of the services) at your option.
ii. State that in no circumstances will you be liable for
special or consequential damages or lost profits (or lost
data).
iii. State that in no case will the your liability exceed
the amount paid by the customer. This should be a separate
paragraph from the disclaimers of warranty.
iv. Distributors should state in their contracts with customers
that the only warranty that applies is the manufacturers
warranty. (Distributors should try to obtain an agreement
from the manufacturer indemnifying and defending them against
any litigation brought regarding the product.)
v. Note that some states have laws restricting limitations
of liability and remedies, so a clause should be included
stating that if any portion of the agreement is found to be
invalid, then the narrowest segment possible is to be held
to be excised from the agreement, and the remainder continues
in full force and effect.
f. Unlike in Europe, outside of COPPA, health-care companies
and financial-services companies, U.S. federal and state laws
do not generally (so far) require that a website that collects
user information have a privacy policy. On the other hand,
consumers increasingly look for them.
i. Just be sure you can live with whatever you put into your
privacy policy, since the Federal Trade Commission (FTC)
has come down hard on companies that violate their own policies.
ii. Its also an excellent idea to state in your policy
that it may be subject to change by your posting an upcoming
amendment to it on your site and then proceeding with the
change after 30 days except for users who affirmatively opt
out.
iii. The FTC does have certain regulations that apply to
all direct marketers, including e-commerce websites. For more
information, see http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/conline/pubs/buspubs/checklist.htm.
g. Never put anything on your website that would matter if
it were stolen. Even though you may have the right to pursue
the offending party (assuming you can identify them), the
cost may be prohibitive and the thief may be judgment-proof.
h. Several insurance companies offer cyber-liability
policies. If you have an e-commerce site, talk to your insurance
broker about obtaining this coverage.
i. Lastly, with rare exceptions, you cannot offer stock via
your website: this constitutes public advertising
and is forbidden.
9. CONCLUSION
a. Remember, the general rule is that if something is a legal
issue in the real world, its also a legal issue on the
Internet.
b. Most of the litigation has stemmed from "commercial"
websites, meaning websites that offer or promote the owner's
goods or services. With these you need to be more cautious,
particularly with regard to competitors. Personal websites,
purely informational websites, websites devoted to a particular
topic etc. tend not to face as great a risk.
The foregoing article constitutes general information only
and should not be relied upon as legal advice.
Methven & Associates
2232 Sixth Street Berkeley, CA 94710
phone: 510) 649-4019 fax: 510) 649-4024
e-mail: bmethven@methvenlaw.com
Web site: methvenlaw.com
Copyright 2001-2003 Bruce E. Methven. All Rights Reserved.
Article Source: EzineArticles.com
Go
To Products Page
|